dc.contributor.author | McCabe, Linda L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bradford L., Therrell Jr. | |
dc.contributor.author | McCabe, Edward R.B. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-06T17:43:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-06T17:43:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ub.edu.ar/handle/123456789/2876 | |
dc.description.abstract | Newborn screening has existed for approximately four decades [1]. During that period of time, newborn screening has
evolved conceptually from a laboratory test for a single disorder, phenylketonuria (PKU), to a multi-part public health system
involving education, screening, diagnostic follow-up, treatment/management, and system evaluation [2–5]. At a time when
newborn screening is recognized as a model for predictive medicine [6,7], it also faces critical challenges that will determine its
future credibility and viability. In order to understand these challenges, it is helpful to review briefly the history of newborn
screening. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | en | es_ES |
dc.publisher.Editor | Universidad de Belgrano - Documentos CEEGMD - Centro para el estudio de enfermedades genéticas, metabólicas y discapacidades. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 77;YEAR 2002 - 267–273 | |
dc.subject | Newborn screening | es_ES |
dc.subject | public health | es_ES |
dc.subject | PKU | es_ES |
dc.subject | examen neonatal | es_ES |
dc.subject | salud pública | es_ES |
dc.title | Newborn screening: rationale for a comprehensive, fully integrated public health system | es_ES |
dc.type | Article | es_ES |